Azure SQL Managed Instance vs AWS RDS

Compare Azure MI vs AWS RDS

Features

Azure SQL Managed Instance

AWS RDS for SQL Server

Deployment

Created via Azure portal in a VNet; a few hours to provision fully, but minimal user config (Azure sets up SQL).

Launch via AWS console by selecting SQL edition/size – automated provisioning in minutes, no OS install needed.

Management

Fully managed by Azure – patching, updates, backups handled by service.

Fully managed by AWS – automated backups, patching during maintenance windows.

Customization

Restricted – cannot access OS or certain features; limited to options Azure exposes (instance size, certain settings).

Somewhat limited – no OS access, must use parameter groups for tuning; many but not all SQL features availableSomewhat limited – no OS access, must use parameter groups for tuning; many but not all SQL features available.

Use Case

Best for migrating on-prem apps to Azure with minimal changes, needing instance-level features (Agent, cross-DB) but wanting a managed service.

Great for simplifying DB management in AWS for standard workloads – companies that want cloud automation and can live within RDS feature limits (trading some flexibility for ease).

Maintenance Responsibility

Microsoft – Azure automatically patches OS and SQL engine (with almost no downtime).

Amazon – AWS applies SQL patches during set maintenance windows (or automatic minor version upgrades).

Operational Control

Partial – you have instance-level admin in SQL, but no OS access and some server-level permissions are restricted by Azure.

Partial – you get an admin account but not full sysadmin; certain procedures and settings are blocked for stability.

Backups

Automated: Azure performs continuous backups (point-in-time restore up to 35 days); user can initiate extra backups to storage for long-term.

Automated: daily snapshots + log backups (PITR up to 35 days) are handled by AWS; you can also take manual snapshots for longer retention.

Scalability

Vertical: change vCore count (online resize with brief disruption); Horizontal: limited – one primary instance, can add geo-replicas for read/DR (no multiple writable instances).

Vertical: modify instance class (reboot); Horizontal: Read Replicas (for Enterprise) allow up to 5 read-only copies (including cross-region); no horizontal write scaling (one primary).

Performance

Very good for most cases: GP tier ~ “disk over network” latency (~5-10ms) and up to ~80k IOPS at max vCores, BC tier ~ “local SSD” latency (1-2ms) and up to ~320k IOPS at max size; Azure manages performance, but you might not reach extreme on-prem levels for edge cases.

Strong performance for most workloads but with some cloud overhead: RDS uses EBS storage (e.g., gp3 or io2 volumes up to 64k+ IOPS), and you can choose instance types with more memory/CPU. Very large workloads or those needing special hardware (like NVMe) might not fit in RDS’s offerings as of now.

Elasticity

No auto-scale of vCores on-the-fly; you must manually scale up/down. However, you can add/remove Managed Instances in a pool (instance pools) if using that model for multi-instance elasticity, but that’s more static allocation of multiple MIs.

No automatic compute scaling – the instance class is fixed. RDS does support auto storage increase, so storage can grow with usage. For compute, one could use AWS Application Auto Scaling for RDS in some cases to trigger a bigger instance on schedule, but it involves a reboot – so essentially not seamless auto-scale.

SQL Server Version

Azure handles the version – effectively it’s the latest SQL Server engine (currently equivalent to 2019/2022). You can’t choose an older engine version, but you can set database compatibility level down to 100 (SQL 2008) for legacy T-SQL compatibility.

RDS supports multiple SQL Server versions (as of 2023, versions 2012, 2014, 2016, 2017, 2019, and now 2022 are available on RDS) – you choose a major version when launching, and AWS handles the minor version patching. However, older versions eventually get deprecated for new instances.

SQL Feature Support

Yes, one of MI’s advantages over Azure SQL DB – you can do three-part naming queries across databases on the instance, and even cross-instance via linked servers (within some constraints of managed env).

Most SQL Server features are supported, but RDS lacks extensibility: no FILESTREAM, PolyBase, ML Services, CLR (2017+), or xp_cmdshell. Some server-level settings can’t be changed after launch.

Cross-Database Queries

Yes, if multiple databases are on the same RDS instance, you can cross-query them. You cannot cross-query between different RDS instances directly (no official linked server support for cross-instance, since you lack sysadmin to configure it, though heterogeneous links might be possible in some cases with limitations).

Custom Software

No – you cannot RDP into the instance or install anything. CLR assemblies are allowed in SAFE mode within SQL (no external access), but you can’t install a custom extensibility framework or third-party utility on the server. Integration with other services must be done externally over network.

No – cannot access the OS. Even enabling certain SQL features that require custom action is not possible. For example, you cannot install a custom certificate for SQL Server at the OS level (RDS manages the certificates). You rely on what AWS provides out-of-box.

Network Configuration

Deployed into your VNet (requires a dedicated subnet)– it gets a private IP. You manage NSGs for that subnet. By default no public endpoint (optionally can enable one). It’s like a managed appliance sitting in your network.

Deployed in your AWS VPC – you choose subnet group (which maps to subnets in different AZs for Multi-AZ). Usually kept in a private subnet; you control access via security groups and route tables. Option for a public endpoint exists (mainly for development or if you have no VPN).

Security

Platform-managed security: TDE on by default, backups encrypted. Azure manages OS security patches. You can use Azure AD authentication for tighter identity control. MI is deployed in your private network, adding an extra layer of isolation. It meets Azure’s compliance standards out-of-the-box (you just focus on DB-level security like user permissions).

RDS encrypts data, logs, and backups using AWS KMS, supports SSL for in-transit encryption, and integrates with AWS Directory Service for Windows Authentication. AWS manages OS security patching, and RDS meets compliance standards like SOC1 and PCI DSS.

Authentication

SQL Auth and Azure Active Directory Auth supported. You set an AAD admin and then you can use AAD users/groups as logins. No direct Windows AD integration (would need to sync AD to AAD). This gives centralized cloud identity management for the MI.

Supports SQL authentication and Windows Authentication via AWS Managed Microsoft AD, allowing domain-joined AD users to log in. Does not support Azure AD or IAM authentication for SQL Server.

High Availability

Built-in: MI (Business Critical) has HA with automatic failover of the primary replica to a secondary if something happens (Azure handles it). General Purpose has Azure Service Fabric-based failover using remote storage. Either way, you get an SLA for HA without configuring clustering yourself.

RDS Multi-AZ maintains a synchronous standby replica in another AZ, enabling automatic failover (30-60s) during outages. The application reconnects to the same endpoint seamlessly.

Disaster Recovery

Easy DR: you can configure a geo-replica MI in another region (Auto-failover Group). This will asynchronously replicate all databases. Failover can be automatic (for groups) or manual. If you choose not to have a second MI, you still have geo-redundant backups which you could restore in another region (slower recovery).

RDS Enterprise Edition supports Cross-Region Read Replicas for DR and read scaling, but writes require manual promotion. Non-Enterprise users rely on manual snapshots for cold standby, as automated cross-region failover isn’t built-in.

Pricing

Azure SQL MI pricing is per vCore, per hour, plus storage and backup costs. An 8 vCore General Purpose instance with 4TB follows an hourly compute + per-GB-month storage model. Business Critical costs 2-3× more per vCore due to faster hardware and extra replicas. SQL licensing is included.

RDS for SQL Server charges hourly based on instance class, storage, and I/O. Pricing includes the SQL license, making it costlier than MySQL/Postgres. A db.m5.2xlarge (8 vCPU, 32GB) costs ~$3/hour, while Multi-AZ roughly doubles the price.

Licensing Model

Azure SQL MI supports License-Included or Azure Hybrid Benefit, which lowers costs if you bring SQL Server licenses with Software Assurance. Reserved Capacity (1-3 years) offers discounts over pay-as-you-go.

RDS for SQL Server is License-Included only (except RDS Custom); BYOL is not supported. Costs include SQL Server CALs or per-core licensing, with discounts available via Reserved Instances (1-3 years). Express/Web editions are cheaper but limited.

Pricing Comparison of Database Configuration

8vCore + 4TB Data size + Backup,  Single Instance

An 8 vCore, 4TB General Purpose Azure SQL MI in East US costs $1,700–$2,000/month ($1,300 compute + $400 storage). Hybrid Benefit can reduce compute costs by 30-40%.

A db.m5.2xlarge (8 vCPU) RDS SQL Standard instance with 4TB General Purpose storage in US East costs $2.2k–$2.5k/month on-demand ($3.00–$3.50/hour), including the SQL license. Running the same on EC2 (BYOL) is cheaper but lacks RDS’s management benefits.

8vCore + 4TB Data size + Backup + DR/HA

A second 8-vCore MI (Auto-Failover Group) doubles the cost to $3,500–$4,000/month. If using Business Critical, an 8 vCore, 4TB instance costs $5,000+ per month, including 3 built-in replicas (no extra VM needed for HA).

The same 8 vCPU Multi-AZ (HA enabled) instance costs $4.4k–$5k/month due to a standby replica. Adding a cross-region read replica increases the total to $7k+/month. Costs can be reduced with Reserved Instances or Standard edition instead of Enterprise.